Settlement.
100% ownership goes to Tricia.
We have moved all files into a read only folder: LINK
Happy sleuthing folks!
Friday 27 March 2015
Wednesday 4 March 2015
One simple argument ..
As we come up to the trail date, which will be announced over the next few days .. I wanted to break this case down to it's simplest argument.
Basically this lawsuit boils down to two important documents.
An email sent to Tricia on April 24, 2011 [here] .. stating that Tricia was entitled to draw a salary of up to $3000 per month including expenses already paid for Websleuths LLC.
Then the legal contract for Websleuths LCC signed on May 1, 2011 [here]
If the email sent to Tricia which pre-dates the contract by only 7 days is deemed to be enough for Tricia to believe she was within her rights to withdraw monies from the LLC account, then Tricia wins. If the contract omitting the agreement is deemed to override that email is enough to cancel that arrangement Sue does.
Everything else comes down to intent, and intent may be what ultimately leads the jury to decide between the email and the contract above.
The jury may decide that even though the contract is a weightier document than the email, that the fact that it was drawn up by Sue's husband and they may have deliberately left out the important disclaimer when it came to managerial income. Apart from that there is ample evidence of other mis-doings on the part of Sue Pruitt, so we shall have to be patient and see.
It all depends on what is presented in court and the final decision shall be up to the jury, we shall try to keep you as up to date as possible.
P.S. If anyone is attending the trial and has a twitter account and would be willing to do live updates please let us know below and include your twitter account and tweet to #WebsleuthsLawsuit
Basically this lawsuit boils down to two important documents.
An email sent to Tricia on April 24, 2011 [here] .. stating that Tricia was entitled to draw a salary of up to $3000 per month including expenses already paid for Websleuths LLC.
Then the legal contract for Websleuths LCC signed on May 1, 2011 [here]
If the email sent to Tricia which pre-dates the contract by only 7 days is deemed to be enough for Tricia to believe she was within her rights to withdraw monies from the LLC account, then Tricia wins. If the contract omitting the agreement is deemed to override that email is enough to cancel that arrangement Sue does.
Everything else comes down to intent, and intent may be what ultimately leads the jury to decide between the email and the contract above.
The jury may decide that even though the contract is a weightier document than the email, that the fact that it was drawn up by Sue's husband and they may have deliberately left out the important disclaimer when it came to managerial income. Apart from that there is ample evidence of other mis-doings on the part of Sue Pruitt, so we shall have to be patient and see.
It all depends on what is presented in court and the final decision shall be up to the jury, we shall try to keep you as up to date as possible.
P.S. If anyone is attending the trial and has a twitter account and would be willing to do live updates please let us know below and include your twitter account and tweet to #WebsleuthsLawsuit
Monday 23 February 2015
201344862 - PRUITT, SUSAN vs. GRIFFITH, PATRICIA ARRINGTON (Court 157)
This post will appear on top of the blog whenever a new filing is made to the courts.
Civil Case Information Sheet
Plaintiffs' Original Petition
Civil Process pick up form
Citation (secretary of state non-resident)
FREE fax Cover Sheet
Defendant's Original Answer and requests for Disclosure
Proposed Order
FREE fax Cover Sheet
Proposed Order
Exhibit A
Exhibit C
Exhibit B
Exhibit A
Griffith's No Evidence and Traditional Motions for Partial Summary Judgment
Proposed Order
Exhibit A
Motion for Continuance
Proposed Order
Exhibit A
Plaintiff's Objection to Defendant's Summary Judgement
NOTICE OF SUBMISSION FOR PATRICIA GRIFFITH’S NO-EVIDENCE AND TRADITIONAL MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Letter to Court
DOCKET CONTROL/PRETRIAL ORDER SIGNED
Defendant's First Amended Answer
Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Responses Regarding Gambling
Proposed Order
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Exhibit C
Exhibit D
Exhibit E
Exhibit F
Exhibit G
Reporter's Certificate Oral Videotaped Deposition of Patricia A Griffth September 27, 2014
Websleuths.com LLCs and Patricia Arrington Griffiths First Amended Counter Petition and request for Declaratory Judgement
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Exhibit C
Exhibit D
Exhibit E
Exhibit F
Griffith's Amended No Evidence and Traditional Motions for Summary Judgement
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Exhibit C
Exhibit D
Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel
Exhibits A
Notice of Oral Hearing for Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Responses Regarding Gambling
Notice of Submission for Patricia Griffith's Amended No-Evidence and Traditional Motions for Partial Summary Judgement
Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Amended No-Evidence and Traditional Motions for Partial Summary Judgement
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Exhibit C
Exhibit D
Exhibit E
Exhibit F
Exhibit G
Exhibit H
Exhibit I
Exhibit J
Proposed Order on Denying Defendant Patricia Griffith's Amended No-Evidence and Traditional Motions For Partial Summary Judgement
GRIFFITH'S (1) MOTION TO STRIKE, (2) REPLY TO PRUITT'S RESPONSE TO GRIFFITH'S AMENDED NO-EVIDENCE AND TRADITIONAL MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGEMENT, AND (3) REQUEST FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES
Exhibits
ORDER SIGNED DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION
Proposed on Griffith's Traditional Motion For Partial Summary Judgement
Proposed on Griffith's No-Evidence Motion For Partial Summary Judgement
ORDER SIGNED DENYING FINAL SUMMARY JUDGEMENT
Defendants Declaration Invoking Offer - Of Settlement Procedure
NOTICE OF ORAL HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMMENDED PETITION AND PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSED MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE
Proposed Order
Exhibit A
Opposed Motion for Continuance
NOTICE OF ORAL HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED PETITION AND PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSED MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE
Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Continuance
Exhibit A
Exhibt B
Exhibit C
ORDER SIGNED DENYING TRIAL CONTINUANCE
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE PLEADING SIGNED
Plaintiff's Second Amended Original Petition
Defendant's Amended Answer
Defendant's Second Amended Answer
Reporter's certificate oral deposition of Patricia A. Griffith January 29, 2015
Joint Letter to Court in Advance of Trial
Plaintiff's Rule 193.7 Notice
Plaintiff's Amended Rule 193.7 Notice
Griffith's Notice of Intent to Use Pruitt's Discovery Products Under TRCP 193.7
Jury Demand amended to Plaintiff's Jury Demand on the site
Proposed Order Overruling Defendant's Objection to Plaintiff's Jury Demand
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Exhibit C
Exhibit D
Plaintiff's Response to Griffith's Objection to Pruitt's Jury Demand
Proposed Order on Plaintiff's Jury Demand
Griffith Sur-Reply to Pruitt's Untimely Demand for Jury Trial
-- END FILINGS --
FOLDER CONTAINING ALL FILES READ ONLY
Items unlinked are documents not available for download at the Office of Harris County District Court.
Civil Case Information Sheet
Plaintiffs' Original Petition
Civil Process pick up form
Citation (secretary of state non-resident)
FREE fax Cover Sheet
Defendant's Original Answer and requests for Disclosure
FREE fax Cover Sheet
Proposed Order
Exhibit A
ORDER SIGNED GRANTING MOTION TO SHOW AUTHORITY
ORDER SIGNED REALIGNING PARTIES
ORDER SIGNED STRIKING PLEADING
Not available for public view
Exhibit A
Not available for public view
Exhibit B
Not available for public view
DOCKET CONTROL/PRETRIAL ORDER SIGNED
Reporter's Certificate Oral Deposition of Susan Pruitt
Exhibit D
Reporter's Certificate Oral Deposition of Susan Pruitt
Exhibit D
Exhibit C
Exhibit B
Exhibit A
Griffith's No Evidence and Traditional Motions for Partial Summary Judgment
Proposed Order
Exhibit A
Motion for Continuance
Proposed Order
Exhibit A
Plaintiff's Objection to Defendant's Summary Judgement
NOTICE OF SUBMISSION FOR PATRICIA GRIFFITH’S NO-EVIDENCE AND TRADITIONAL MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Letter to Court
DOCKET CONTROL/PRETRIAL ORDER SIGNED
Defendant's First Amended Answer
Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Responses Regarding Gambling
Proposed Order
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Exhibit C
Exhibit D
Exhibit E
Exhibit F
Exhibit G
Reporter's Certificate Oral Videotaped Deposition of Patricia A Griffth September 27, 2014
Websleuths.com LLCs and Patricia Arrington Griffiths First Amended Counter Petition and request for Declaratory Judgement
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Exhibit C
Exhibit D
Exhibit E
Exhibit F
Griffith's Amended No Evidence and Traditional Motions for Summary Judgement
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Exhibit C
Exhibit D
Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel
Exhibits A
Notice of Oral Hearing for Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Responses Regarding Gambling
Notice of Submission for Patricia Griffith's Amended No-Evidence and Traditional Motions for Partial Summary Judgement
Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Amended No-Evidence and Traditional Motions for Partial Summary Judgement
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Exhibit C
Exhibit D
Exhibit E
Exhibit F
Exhibit G
Exhibit H
Exhibit I
Exhibit J
Proposed Order on Denying Defendant Patricia Griffith's Amended No-Evidence and Traditional Motions For Partial Summary Judgement
GRIFFITH'S (1) MOTION TO STRIKE, (2) REPLY TO PRUITT'S RESPONSE TO GRIFFITH'S AMENDED NO-EVIDENCE AND TRADITIONAL MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGEMENT, AND (3) REQUEST FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES
Exhibits
ORDER SIGNED DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION
Proposed on Griffith's Traditional Motion For Partial Summary Judgement
Proposed on Griffith's No-Evidence Motion For Partial Summary Judgement
ORDER SIGNED DENYING FINAL SUMMARY JUDGEMENT
Defendants Declaration Invoking Offer - Of Settlement Procedure
NOTICE OF ORAL HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMMENDED PETITION AND PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSED MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE
Proposed Order
Exhibit A
Opposed Motion for Continuance
NOTICE OF ORAL HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED PETITION AND PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSED MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE
Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Continuance
Exhibit A
Exhibt B
Exhibit C
ORDER SIGNED DENYING TRIAL CONTINUANCE
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE PLEADING SIGNED
Plaintiff's Second Amended Original Petition
Defendant's Amended Answer
Defendant's Second Amended Answer
Reporter's certificate oral deposition of Patricia A. Griffith January 29, 2015
Joint Letter to Court in Advance of Trial
Plaintiff's Rule 193.7 Notice
Plaintiff's Amended Rule 193.7 Notice
Griffith's Notice of Intent to Use Pruitt's Discovery Products Under TRCP 193.7
Jury Demand amended to Plaintiff's Jury Demand on the site
Proposed Order Overruling Defendant's Objection to Plaintiff's Jury Demand
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Exhibit C
Exhibit D
Plaintiff's Response to Griffith's Objection to Pruitt's Jury Demand
Proposed Order on Plaintiff's Jury Demand
Griffith Sur-Reply to Pruitt's Untimely Demand for Jury Trial
-- END FILINGS --
FOLDER CONTAINING ALL FILES READ ONLY
Items unlinked are documents not available for download at the Office of Harris County District Court.
Tuesday 16 December 2014
Wednesday 3 December 2014
Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Amended No-Evidence and Traditional Motions for Partial Summary Judgement
Reading through the latest documents a couple of things really stood out to me in this document. Starting here:
Thus it is not a STRETCH for any reasonable mind to determine that the Defendant PREYED on her VICTIMS and then sought and obtained money from these victims / members of the Websleuths.com website.
Oh no, it is indeed a GIANT LEAP. To go from complaining about money issues and taking money for Ad Free, to saying she used Websleuths as her grooming ground is a HUGE STRETCH. Especially when so many affidavits filed at the same time do nothing but complain that Tricia was largely MIA from the forum, so when prey, did all this grooming take place?
The Great Clay Davis you say? Well .. Sheeeeeeeeeeeeeeit!!
Monday 24 November 2014
Not So Blind Item: Alien Invasion
It has been reported that some on a quest for justice (who were famously cast out of one queendom and forged forth to create their own) have recently been the victims of alien attack! Coming from the skies and unexpectedly time and time again comes an alien craft carrying this little green lady. It seems her mission is to bring news of unrest in their former land. How this is of any value or interest to them remains a mystery.
Saturday 22 November 2014
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)